
In the city's latest attempt to increase my blood pressure, Governor Pat Quinn has decided to close the gap on the state's budget crisis by giving early release to 1,000 non-violent prison inmates this fall:
http://cbs2chicago.com/local/Quinn.prisoners.release.2.1194057.html
Yes, you have read correctly.
OK, I have decided to take a different approach in response to this abomination of an idea. Let me put on my rose colored glasses for a moment and walk my way through this ingenious idea. In order to save the state $5 million bucks, Governor Quinn is releasing 1,000 non-violent prisoners who are serving time for drug dealing, robbery, fraud, prostitution, embezzlement, and sexual harassment, etc. And let's say, for the sake of making the absurd seem ludicrous, that 50% of these "pillars of society" never commit another crime, while the other 50% do. We will have really dodged a bullet there. That means that we'll only have 500 new criminals selling drugs, robbing, and stealing from us, instead of 1,000 new criminals selling drugs, robbing, and stealing from us.
Turn that frown upside down campers! According to the aforementioned cbs2chicago.com article, "Those (non-viloent and thus saintly inmates) sent home early will be assigned a parole agent and required to wear an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet upon their early release." Whew! That made me feel better for roughly 7 seconds until I read that, "The state has 400 parole agents, who are responsible for overseeing more than 30,000 adult and juvenile parolees." So, by my grade school calculations, each parole agent is in charge of approximately 75 parolees. How's that for some quality one on one attention? If that doesn't make you feel safe at night, this won't either. Each parolee is only required to meet with their parole officer once a month.
Ok, I have torn off my rose colored shades and stomped them into tiny pieces.
The Governor will save the state $5 million bucks, yes, but what is he going to cost us in the long run? What will it cost the state to re-arrest those 500 (if we're lucky) convicted criminals again, prosecute them again, and jail them again? How much will it cost you, me, or the guy across the street when our homes or vehicles are broken into, or our identities are stolen? What will it cost the parents of a kid who is sold drugs by one of these "non-violent" criminals?
On the laundry list of "Things Chicago Doesn't Need," wouldn't 1,000 criminals being released prematurely have to be in the team photo, along with more traffic jams, more needless taxes, and colder winters? In fact, isn't the introduction of more criminals the very last thing that our city needs more of? Besides, of course, more politicians, or their disgraceful ploys at cutting into a budget deficit that they themselves have created in first place.


